Facebook is one of the popular social networks which extended the social interactions from physical to digital. Facebook has grown phenomenally and today, it has came out with the new-look with new layouts and designs with the aim to allow the users to interact in faster and convenient ways. However, this has left some devotees fuming in adopting the new design. Forums devoted to savaging the new Facebook format are flooded. Some dislike, but some had given the positive feedback about the better organized and improvements that have been made (
australianit.news.com.au 2008).
Facebook New Layout
Source:Google Image
An appropriate web design and layout of Facebook is essential in easing the users in social interactions, provide better visualization and thus gaining their acceptance. Hence, it is also depend on the personality of the users on how they perceive the changes.
Facebook has make changes to the design and layout with the motivation by feedback from the users and the trend toward information sharing online. Efforts and hard work had been done in order to create a design and layout that best suited the users. According to Reep (2006), a good document design is able to increase the usefulness of document as it guides readers through the text and keep readers focus on the information they need. Headings, subheadings, logos and icons are used in Facebook as appropriate outline, sequence; identification and linkage are provided which can reduce the confusion of the users.
Further, research has been done about the visualization application of social interaction with individual Facebook users showed that Facebook provides users with visualization flexibility where they can instruct what data they would like and animated the events (Okamoto & Buza 2008).
Multimodal texts are those texts where meaning is communicated through a synchronization of modes (Walsh 2006). Facebook has utilized this function as it incorporate images, videos, music and sounds in communicating with the users all in one place. This could enhance the interrelation of the modes and thus improve the communications.
As mentioned above, some users gave negative comments about the makeover of Facebook. Their acceptance towards the new layout may depend on the personality on how they perceived the changes. As stated in Desai (2009), it is more likely a psychological issue as people always resist making changes to something they have accustomed. In this case, I personally think that they might be reluctant to change as they are familiar with the old layout. But once they get used to the new one again, they will find that it is useful and improved.
Overall, I personally think that an appropriate layout and design is essential for Facebook in easing the interactions and provide better visualization. The negative feedback received of the new layout may due to the personality and resist of making changes of the users.
Referencing
Australianit.news.com.au 2008, Facebook makeover leaves some devotes fuming, viewed 6th June 2009, http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,24328928-15318,00.html.
Desai, A 2009, Facebook new layout reviews and feedback, Gigathoughts, Word Press, viewed 8th June 2009,
http://www.gigathoughts.com/uncategorized/facebook-new-layout-reviews-and-feedback.html.
Okamoto, T & Buza, K 2008, ‘Visualization and Social Interactions in Facebook’, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, pp.232-233, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge.
Reep, DC 2006, ‘Document Design’, Technical Writing, Pearson/Longman, Chapter 6, pp. 133 – 172.
Walsh, M 2006, ‘Textual shift’: Examining the reading process with print, visual, and multimodal texts,’ Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol. 29, no.1, p.24-37.